Media Theory. News Abstraction - Journalistic - From Nerd-Geek Abstraction to our reality -
For those who don't know I'm a psychologist... -
But my first college choice has always been journalism.
Our site works with the idea that the Nerd-Geek universe is a bum of the imagination, wherever it arises, for our reality, in the most diverse formats and modalities!
All these modalities are obviously linguistic.
It exists in a field where concepts, and abstraction of concepts, and the greater adventure of imagination and language, become possible!
If the reality of a role-playing game, it can be reproduced. How will we know for ourselves if we're not in an indefinite game yet...!?
Our reality, as we came in the factors of formation of the world, is quite organic and composed, that is, it was, just as we produce and reproduce things, as in a role-playing game, possibly, also, reproduced...
This makes us lose ourselves a little in the ideas of how far I am not imaginary...
Or how far the abstraction of this imaginary is able to go.
But in recent times, I have read and researched direct journalism stuff, written by researchers in the field, that made me "steal" some quotes, and weave paragraphs for a possible book, new ... - apart from my other projects - that I will be able to publish in the future...
But here, for those interested in Journalism and its Abstractions, its possibilities, including its possible surrealism...
Go our notes!
A perfect foundation for what we do on our site... !
Journalism, not everyone knows, also has a very rebellious, rebellious aspect, in the sense of clinging to oneself as a persona, participating in something - in the most co-partipative model of one's vision.
The above text is a monograph that tells about the breadth of the natural, and/or self-creative process of an interview.
We try to ground this psychologically. For example, at some point the Ping-Pong interview may seem to the journalist so automatic, intuitive, that he himself believes that he is within a process. Or that even it no longer analyzes it, but is immersed, participatory, in it. I could be wrong, or give you the humorous and playful idea of breaking every interview - something like the simple thought "why not say everything wrong" and break this cycle so perfect. But he, self-contemplating, accommodates within himself, the idea that it is so good, perceptively, and associatively, that in the face of this he gives up, and does everything catholically correct—even with the feeling that he already knows each concept beforehand, of the questions, in exact sequence, one after the other—that must really be asked.
This current, somewhat breaks, the idea of objectivity, since it comes out of this process to observe and evaluate itself? How to have objectivity, if the self, is contemplated, in the middle, or inside something. and he himself, perhaps "hesitant" or, who knows, himself in the middle, "enchanted", by the two presences, he, and that of the interviewee. Contemplating perhaps what was an idea of automatic thought current, which is made in front of him. Inserted still in history itself, or historicism, tends to be a repetition, or historicity, of a planet-world-earth.
There he is, in the middle of it all!
From a certain point of view, several psychologies, personas, and profiles, have already done that, of their own, similar, similar, or maybe exact way. Like natural phenomena, which would recur in various locations in the galaxy - universe, surrounding - grand, and enormous - overwhelming in catching us in their currents of thought - their own mental determinant, challenged in the cognitive exercise of the interactivity of dialogue.
It can be affected by perceptions, insights, sensations, even... But it is known that in great moments of interview, the sense of connection is unmatched. Like walking in clouds of a server, already beforehand, aware that you would be there, prepared, for your presence - that is - prepared for the perception, that you, who interview, would already be there.
Of course, if this were like an internet server, concepts from psychology, like the terms assimilation, or even synchronicity, since we are composite bodies - all of that, it would be there.
The term then flank comes to us.
Wander aimlessly and unhurriedly, for mere distraction (e.g., flanked through the streets of the old town).
Etymological origin: French flâner.
"flanar", in Dicionário Priberam da Língua Portuguesa [online], 2008-2023, https://dicionario.priberam.org/flanar.Flanar, since it is linked to the unhurried terms - the beyond of time - and fate, something realized in the idea of a mysterious and spontaneous type of occurrences. It leads us to the conception, as in one of the quotes of this text above, that the processes seem to transcend the interviewer and interviewee.
This flanking then, is almost like a somewhat directive attention, in the direction of the automatism of collective psychology, in being in the front, and behind everything... an attention, directive, but also fluctuating, in the direction of these phenomena of language, which are participating in the hidden of this process. That is, in the direction of where the true and legitimate collective phenomena, and of history, are happening!
The most "transcendental" exponent, let's say, in a non-pejorative way, of the bold and advanced journalistic idea, and in our terms, because here I am a psychologist, psychological...it was Hunter Thompson!
But here, we also make an abstract report, of a psychological and philosophical reading of the world, which encompasses all this !
We leave this image, as a note, which perhaps may interest even more our readers, laymen, interested, psychologists... and journalists!